|
allen r
|
 |
« on: June 04, 2008, 12:13:33 AM » |
|
In January there were 2000 posts  May was down to 844 :'( I'd like to thank Andy for creating & maintaining this site. All the excitement of having a contact place has been a big asset for all members & lurkers alike. At the moment it is still chugging along OK. Lets keep it going |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mick curran
Guest
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2008, 07:21:18 AM » |
|
in janurary there were over 2000 post but of that over 1000 were rubish  me included! Now there is more of focus on quality not quantity! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rosko
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2008, 04:25:48 PM » |
|
in janurary there were over 2000 post but of that over 1000 were rubish me included! Now there is more of focus on quality not quantity! Going by the above post, and this one.. there is still plenty of rubbish... Going past 'Bluetongue' this afternoon, and I noticed the nets were up... It's getting close! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Hodgee
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2008, 04:42:33 PM » |
|
in janurary there were over 2000 post but of that over 1000 were rubish me included! Now there is more of focus on quality not quantity! Rubbish = Mariner Posts!! Take your Mariner posts elsewhere Rosko/Mrs GM/Climbo!! Otherwise the forum will lose it's impact. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
climbo
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 04, 2008, 05:21:05 PM » |
|
that's Mariners
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Artson
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 04, 2008, 05:31:02 PM » |
|
Although May had only 844 posts there were in fact 72143 page views.
That is 86 views per Post
As opposed to 37 views per post in January
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Andy H
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 04, 2008, 05:45:56 PM » |
|
Although May had only 844 posts there were in fact 72143 page views.
That is 86 views per Post
As opposed to 37 views per post in January
You guys have way too much time - I love it! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rosko
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 04, 2008, 06:05:57 PM » |
|
The forum is doing a stellar job of passing information amongst the club members.. There is no way that it is losing it's 'IMPACT'.. (hehehe)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
allen r
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2008, 10:37:50 PM » |
|
There is no way that it is losing it's 'IMPACT'.. (hehehe)
That's its not it's  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rosko
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2008, 04:55:06 AM » |
|
I make one tiny mistake and you jump on it... I'm not the school teacher here! The grammar and spelling is atrocious on this forum! That'''''''s it... I''''''m not playing... By the way.. Are you sure that it is incorrect... An apostrophe where I have placed it, is implying ownership! Hmmmmm |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 05, 2008, 04:56:55 AM by rosko »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Hodgee
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2008, 07:19:16 PM » |
|
Sorry boys, Allan's right. Should be "its".
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mick curran
Guest
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 06, 2008, 10:28:09 PM » |
|
Sorry boys, Allan's right. Should be "its".
yep allen is correct because you can not own impact! Another way of looking at it is the apostrophe does not replace a letter. For example, ' doesn't ' is short for does not where the apostophe replaces the 'o'. Therefore in this case there is no apostrophe because it is not replacing a letter. If it was replacing a letter the sentence would be grammatically incorrect " There is no way that it is losing it is 'IMPACT'.. Too much time! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mrs Global Moderator
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 06, 2008, 10:47:07 PM » |
|
is this your idea of getting posts up to 2000 again?? I think it's (or it is) time to move on guys and get a life!!! Speaking of getting a life - just got our info for Mariners membership today - yee haa!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rosko
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 07, 2008, 04:23:14 AM » |
|
Sorry boys, Allan's right. Should be "its".
yep allen is correct because you can not own impact! Another way of looking at it is the apostrophe does not replace a letter. For example, ' doesn't ' is short for does not where the apostophe replaces the 'o'. Therefore in this case there is no apostrophe because it is not replacing a letter. If it was replacing a letter the sentence would be grammatically incorrect " There is no way that it is losing it is 'IMPACT'.. Too much time! Now when I commented that I'm not the school teacher on here, I was hoping a 'real' teacher would have some input, not one that paints with fingers... I'm still going with "it's"! I believe it's technically correct as you can 'own' impact, just as you can own love. Come on Tosser, share the love..  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
